I’m now used, but have an interview for a new position. Beforehand, I have to fill out an software. They want to contact my businesses which include my present one. What need to I tell them? I’m not on the lookout to burn up any bridges if I never accept the position.
No potential employer should really speak to your existing employer all through the job interview course of action, so you need to answer, “No, you may perhaps not contact my existing employer,” and every person will understand. As for former businesses, you will have to offer references at some level if they want to use you and they will have to have to ensure your work historical past for a background test, so the reply should be of course — say that you will be happy to deliver people references at the correct time. The essential in the course of the interviewing method is to not elevate any purple flags or give a prospective employer any purpose to hesitate.
I hope you notice how silly you are, criticizing the legalization of weed and the constraints on businesses from getting any adverse motion mainly because of an employee’s authorized use of hashish. How is this any diverse from employing alcoholics? There are far more alcoholics than pot heads.
I should just print all of the “fan mail” I been given pertaining to my views on this matter. Then the planet would see who seems foolish. Could it be that the profanity and juvenile identify-contacting is a consequence of way too substantially bong on the mind? How else to demonstrate the vulgar hostility and the preposterous argument about the variety of alcoholics vs . “pot heads”? No one particular equated cigarette smoking weed with a ailment this kind of as alcoholism. Most men and women simply just want to stroll as a result of Central Park devoid of struggling the effects and stench of secondhand cannabis smoke when we could be smelling dirty drinking water scorching canine and stale pretzels rather. Cigarette smoking weed is lawful in New York, but not federally and not on the career. But the legislation would make it all but unachievable to discipline a person for impairment at function since you simply cannot ask or take a look at for it, so excellent luck making an attempt to maintain them accountable. If you have been hoping to run a organization, you would fully grasp.
Gregory Giangrande has more than 25 decades of expertise as a chief human sources government. Listen to Greg Weds. at 9:35 a.m. on iHeartRadio 710 WOR with Len Berman and Michael Riedel. E-mail: GoToGreg@NYPost.com. Comply with: GoToGreg.com and on Twitter: @GregGiangrande